USA

Oready, LLC (2)

GAO 25 September 2025
Party
Pro Se Litigant
AI Tool
Implied / unconfirmed

Hallucinated Content

Fabricated

  1. Case Law

    Protester cited Trailboss Enterprises, B-417212.2; GAO found no such decision exists and protester’s 'typo' explanation was unpersuasive.

  2. Case Law

    Protester cited 'JRS Staffing Services, B-409407.7, Apr. 2, 2014, 2014 CPD ¶ 116'; GAO found no such B-number and the CPD ¶116 actually corresponds to a different decision (Government and Military Certification Sys., B-409420).

  3. Case Law

    Protester cited System Studies & Simulation, Inc., B-416693; GAO found no such decision exists.

  4. Case Law

    Protester cited JRS Staffing Services, B-409407 to support claim about unstated evaluation criteria; GAO found no decision using that party with B-409407 (B-409407 corresponds to JCMS) and the cited proposition is unsupported.

Misrepresented

  1. Case Law

    Protester cited Kathpal Technologies, Inc., B-291637.2 claiming it sustained a protest about letters of intent; GAO found the Kathpal decision exists but does not address letters of intent and in fact denied a post-award past-performance challenge.


Outcome

Protests dismissed for abuse

Notes

Actually the fourth order in that case that pertains to hallucinations; a first, June 5 Order is only mentioned in a second, June 18 order that does not call out what appears to be hallucinated references.


View source document →

Data from Damien Charlotin's AI Hallucination Cases Database. Flagged by: David Timm.