Lowrey v. City of Rio Rancho

Plaintiff cited 'Cornell v. Precision Valve & Automation, Inc., 2011 WL 1420182 (D.N.M. 2011)' repeatedly; the Court was unable to find the case and concluded it is fictitious.

Plaintiff relied on 'Baldwin v. Perdue Farms, Inc., 569 F. Supp. 2d 754 (E.D. Va. 2008)'; the Court could not locate this authority and concluded it is nonexistent.

Plaintiff cited Creekmore v. Food Lion, Inc., asserting it supports a rule about incomplete state-court records invalidating removal; the Court found that Creekmore does not support that proposition and Plaintiff misrepresented its holding.

Plaintiff quoted and over-extended a portion of Getty Oil's footnote and represented it as binding Tenth Circuit law; the Court found this characterization misleading.

Plaintiff attributed a non-existent quoted holding to Cornwall v. Robinson and represented it as Tenth Circuit precedent; the Court noted the quoted language does not appear in Cornwall and the issue was not decided there.

Plaintiff cited several Supreme Court and circuit opinions (e.g., Martin v. Franklin Capital, Carnegie-Mellon, Gibbs, Merrell Dow, Steel Co.) and misapplied or overstated their holdings for the proposition that removal should be invalidated here; the Court found those characterizations misleading.