USA

Hampton v. Lofton

CA Arizona (1d) 31 March 2026
Party
Pro Se Litigant
AI Tool
Implied / unconfirmed

Hallucinated Content

Fabricated

  1. Exhibits & Submissions

    Father's opening brief asserted trial-court findings (e.g., Child showed 'persistent hostility toward Father', 'difficulty adjusting to custodial transitions', Father's evidence was 'self-serving', Mother was 'evasive and inconsistent') that do not appear in the superior court's order; the appellate court described these as hallucinated.

  2. Case Law

    Both Father's opening and reply briefs contained legal citations that the appellate court found either did not support his positions or 'appear to be fictitious', contrary to ARCAP 13 requirements.


Outcome

No sanction or outcome recorded.


View source document →

Data from Damien Charlotin's AI Hallucination Cases Database.