UK

Choksi v IPS

High Court 4 November 2025
Party
Lawyer
AI Tool
Google AI Overview

Hallucinated Content

Fabricated

  1. Case Law

    Farnell 2 cited numerous authorities with wrong citations or names and included some cases that do not exist; court found several citations irrelevant and unsupported by the authorities cited.

  2. Case Law

    Claimant's solicitors identified 12 problematic citations; the bundle filed by IPS listed 6 items as 'No. Case Name (as cited)', indicating non-existent or fabricated citations.

Misrepresented

  1. Case Law

    Paralegal responsible for drafting Farnell 2 admitted part of the research used Google's AI 'Overview' feature and that AI-generated results were relied on without appreciation of limitations; court noted misuse of AI and required explanations.


Outcome

No sanction or outcome recorded.


View source document →

Data from Damien Charlotin's AI Hallucination Cases Database.