Choksi v IPS
High Court 4 November 2025
- Party
- Lawyer
- AI Tool
- Google AI Overview
Hallucinated Content
Fabricated
- Case Law
Farnell 2 cited numerous authorities with wrong citations or names and included some cases that do not exist; court found several citations irrelevant and unsupported by the authorities cited.
- Case Law
Claimant's solicitors identified 12 problematic citations; the bundle filed by IPS listed 6 items as 'No. Case Name (as cited)', indicating non-existent or fabricated citations.
Misrepresented
- Case Law
Paralegal responsible for drafting Farnell 2 admitted part of the research used Google's AI 'Overview' feature and that AI-generated results were relied on without appreciation of limitations; court noted misuse of AI and required explanations.
Outcome
No sanction or outcome recorded.
Data from Damien Charlotin's AI Hallucination Cases Database.