← All AI Cases
USA

Alejandro Rios v. Puente Hills Ford

CA California 17 February 2026
Party
Pro Se Litigant
AI Tool
Implied / unconfirmed

Hallucinated Content

Fabricated

  1. Case Law

    Rios cited a non-existent opinion as "Stanley v. Univ. of Southern California (2022) 98 Cal.App.5th 151"; the court found that citation incorrect/not corresponding to an existing 2022 Cal.App.5th reporter opinion.

  2. Case Law

    Rios cited a non-existent opinion as "Eustace v. Lynch (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 1457"; the court found that citation incorrect/not corresponding to an existing 2012 Cal.App.4th reporter opinion.

False Quotes

  1. Case Law

    Rios misquoted language from ten existing cases; the court found the quoted language appears nowhere in those decisions (including purported quotations from Osumi v. Sutton (2007) and Fiore v. Alvord (1985)).

Outcome

Warning
View source document →

Data from Damien Charlotin's AI Hallucination Cases Database.