X. v. Canada
D. DC 16 January 2026
- Party
- Pro Se Litigant
- AI Tool
- Implied / unconfirmed
Hallucinated Content
Fabricated
- Case Law
Court noted plaintiff frequently included direct quotations from case law that do not appear in the cited decisions (citing ECF No. 111 n.4 as examples).
False Quotes
- Case Law
Plaintiff attributed a quotation to Chambers v. NASCO, Inc. that does not appear in that Supreme Court opinion; the court identified the quoted language in Mot. at 12 as absent from Chambers.
Outcome
Adverse Costs order
Flagged by: Jesse Schaefer.