Canada

T.B. v K.M.

King's Bench for Saskatchewan 15 October 2025
Party
Pro Se Litigant
AI Tool
Implied / unconfirmed

Hallucinated Content

Fabricated

  1. Case Law

    Brief cited 'A.M. v C.H., 2019 SKQB 162, 45 CPC (8th) 212' but the citation actually corresponded to Watch v Live Nation Entertainment Inc.; court found the citation incorrect and the brief unreliable.

  2. Case Law

    Brief cited 'Baker v Baker, 2007 ONCA 329, 220 CCC (3d) 74' which the court identified as actually being R v Mariani; citation/name mismatch undermined the brief's trustworthiness.

  3. Case Law

    Brief cited 'R.C. v R.C., 2013 NSCA 71, 331 NSR (2d) 151' but the authority was actually Antigonish/Guysborough Federation of Agriculture v Antigonish County (Municipality); court noted the misattribution.

  4. Case Law

    Brief cited 'M.K. v S.K., 2010 ABQB 150, 99 CPC (6th) 367' which the court noted was actually Magnus v Condominium Plan No. 9511228; another instance of incorrect citation/name.

  5. Case Law

    Brief referenced 'Gordon v Goertz, [1996] 2 SCR 27' but with an incomplete citation; court treated the brief as unreliable in part for this reason.


Outcome

Court declined to award costs to applicantportions of the reply brief were struckadmonishment

View source document →