Slay v. Ross
- Party
- Lawyer
- AI Tool
- Implied / unconfirmed
Hallucinated Content
Fabricated
- Case Law
Appellant's brief cited Waller v. Waller, 288 Ga. 164, 164-165 (2010), which the court found to be fictitious; court noted as an example of AI-generated bogus citation.
- Case Law
Appellant's brief cited Johnson v. Johnson, 286 Ga. 720, 721 (2010), which the court found to be fictitious; cited as part of the pattern of hallucinated cases.
- Case Law
Appellant's brief cited Durden v. Barron, 287 Ga. 858 (2010), which the court determined does not actually exist and flagged as a bogus citation.
- Case Law
Appellant's brief cited In re Waitz, 255 Ga. 474 (1986), which the court identified as another nonexistent authority in the brief.
Outcome
Protect Your Firm Before the Next Sanction
This case is one of 921 documented AI hallucination incidents in legal proceedings. The AI Ethics Training for Attorneys covers the specific failure modes, the Model Rules at risk, and the verification protocols that prevent them — built directly from the sanctions record.