Re A, B, C, D (Extension of assessment; Use of AI: hallucinations)

Skeleton argument contained citations that did not relate to the cases named; advocates agreed several citations/propositions were erroneous and the court identified these as AI-generated fabricated case law.

Some cited authorities were existing cases or statutes that did not support the propositions advanced—misattribution of precedent and statutory provisions traced to AI output.

Statutory provisions were cited in support of propositions they did not establish, attributed to AI assistance without verification.