Prososki v. Regan

Brief repeatedly cited 'Kennedy v. Kennedy, 27 Neb. App. 510, 934 N.W.2d 57 (2019)' and included block quotations and holdings not present; the cited unreported memorandum opinion does not contain the quoted language or the purported holding.

Brief cites 'Miller v. Miller, 227 Neb. 71, 416 N.W.2d 358 (1987)' and attributes quotations/holdings that the court determined are fictitious; the citation refers to a nonexistent authority as used.

Brief purports to quote Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-2923 as stating a specific policy favoring frequent contact with both parents; the statute does not contain the quoted language and was misquoted.

Brief attributes a quoted principle about notice of issues to Simons v. Simons that does not appear in the opinion; the quoted language cannot be found in the case and the case does not support the proposition advanced.

Brief attributes quotations and holdings to Bergmeier v. Bergmeier that do not appear in that opinion and misstates the case's holdings.