USA

Prisbrey v. Prisbrey

CA Utah 19 March 2026
Party
Lawyer
AI Tool
Implied / unconfirmed

Hallucinated Content

Fabricated

  1. Case Law

    Appellate brief included multiple incorrect or nonexistent Utah case citations; the court found four of six cited authorities incorrect and said some citations "appear to be made out of whole cloth."

Misrepresented

  1. Case Law

    Argument section contained several incorrect citations (wrong case names, unrelated authority, incorrect paragraph cites); only one of seven citations in that section was correct according to the court.


Outcome

No sanction or outcome recorded.


View source document →

Flagged by: Jesse Schaefer.


Protect Your Firm Before the Next Sanction

This case is one of 921 documented AI hallucination incidents in legal proceedings. The AI Ethics Training for Attorneys covers the specific failure modes, the Model Rules at risk, and the verification protocols that prevent them — built directly from the sanctions record.