Pizzimenti v. City of Detroit, et al.
- Party
- Pro Se Litigant
- AI Tool
- Implied / unconfirmed
Hallucinated Content
Fabricated
- Case Law
Plaintiff cited 'Williams v. City of Cleveland, No. 1:18-CV-2911, 2019 WL 5485190 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 25, 2019),' which the court and R&R found does not exist in Westlaw or under that docket.
- Case Law
Complaint referenced 'Thaxton v. City of Pontiac, No. 298862, 2011 WL 522951 (Mich. Ct. App. Feb. 15, 2011),' a citation the court says does not exist.
- Case Law
Complaint referenced 'Smith v. State, 26 N.E.3d 1167 (Ind. 2015),' which the court was unable to locate or identify as relevant.
False Quotes
- Case Law
Plaintiff quoted language attributed to Jensen v. Utah Cnty., 2025 WL 2208257 (D. Utah Aug. 4, 2025), but the quoted passage does not appear in that opinion.
Misrepresented
- Case Law
Plaintiff cited Opulent Life Church, 697 F.3d 279 in support of fines/Eighth Amendment/retaliation arguments, but the court noted that Opulent Life Church does not involve fines nor those claims and was thus misapplied.