Kusmin L. Amarsingh v. Frontier Airlines, Inc.

Brief contained seven case citations that the court could not locate; court ordered appellant to produce accurate copies or explain and concluded they were fabricated by ChatGPT.

Appellant's brief included seven case citations that the court could not locate; court determined they were fabricated outputs of ChatGPT.

Appellant attributed propositions or quotations to a real case that did not contain the quoted language or stand for the cited proposition; court determined the attribution was inaccurate and resulted from AI output.

A second instance where appellant attributed a quotation or proposition to an actual opinion that did not contain that material; court treated this as an AI-produced misquote and part of the reckless failure to verify authorities.

Appellant attributed propositions and quotations to two real cases that did not contain those propositions or quotations; court found the attributions inaccurate.