Interest of M. O. W.
CA Texas, Austin 7 November 2025
- Party
- Lawyer
- AI Tool
- Implied / unconfirmed
Hallucinated Content
Fabricated
- Case Law
Appellant's brief included multiple case citations that the court determined do not exist (apparently AI‑fabricated case law). The court expressly stated these cases 'do not exist.'
Misrepresented
- Case Law
Appellant cited existing cases that the court found did not support the legal propositions he asserted (misrepresented precedent).
Outcome
No sanction or outcome recorded.
Protect Your Firm Before the Next Sanction
This case is one of 921 documented AI hallucination incidents in legal proceedings. The AI Ethics Training for Attorneys covers the specific failure modes, the Model Rules at risk, and the verification protocols that prevent them — built directly from the sanctions record.