USA

In re: Todd Elliott Koger

W.D. Pennsylvania (Bankruptcy) 30 September 2025
Party
Pro Se Litigant
AI Tool
Implied / unconfirmed

Hallucinated Content

Fabricated

  1. Case Law

    Court identified a non-existent case cited by the Kogers—used in their filings to support preclusion/ownership arguments—and noted it appeared fabricated, suggesting AI-generated pleadings and raising Rule 9011 concerns.


Outcome

One-year filing bar.

Notes

The Court observed that several authorities cited in the Kogers' pro se filings do not exist and appeared to be fabricated (noting possible use of AI), warned of Rule 9011 implications, and treated the filings as part of an abusive litigation strategy warranting dismissal and a one-year filing bar.


View source document →