In re: Snowflake, Inc., Data Security Breach Litigation
- Party
- Pro Se Litigant
- AI Tool
- Implied / unconfirmed
Hallucinated Content
Fabricated
- Case Law
Panel identified this citation in the plaintiff's brief as apparently fabricated and not an actual JPML decision.
- Case Law
Panel identified this citation in the plaintiff's brief as apparently fabricated and not an actual JPML order.
False Quotes
- Case Law
Plaintiff attributed a quotation/holding to this JPML decision that the Panel found was misrepresented or fabricated in the brief.
- Case Law
Plaintiff attributed a quotation/holding to this JPML decision that the Panel found was misrepresented or fabricated in the brief.
- Case Law
Plaintiff attributed a quotation/holding to this Ninth Circuit decision that the Panel found was misrepresented or fabricated in the brief.
- Case Law
Plaintiff attributed a quotation/holding to this JPML decision that the Panel found was misrepresented or fabricated in the brief.
- Case Law
Plaintiff attributed a quotation/holding to this district court decision that the Panel found was misrepresented or fabricated in the brief.
Outcome
Protect Your Firm Before the Next Sanction
This case is one of 921 documented AI hallucination incidents in legal proceedings. The AI Ethics Training for Attorneys covers the specific failure modes, the Model Rules at risk, and the verification protocols that prevent them — built directly from the sanctions record.