USA

Hessert v. Hessert & Wieland-Pulayya

CA Florida (6th) 20 March 2026
Party
Pro Se Litigant
AI Tool
Implied / unconfirmed

Hallucinated Content

Fabricated

  1. Case Law

    Court determined five of the cases cited in the petition do not exist and appear to be fabricated; petitioner ordered to provide copies of all cited cases that exist and to show cause.

Misrepresented

  1. Case Law

    Court determined four of the cited cases exist but were cited for legal propositions those cases do not actually represent (misrepresented precedent); court warned about reliance on AI and required cite-checking.


Outcome

Order to show Cause

View source document →

Protect Your Firm Before the Next Sanction

This case is one of 921 documented AI hallucination incidents in legal proceedings. The AI Ethics Training for Attorneys covers the specific failure modes, the Model Rules at risk, and the verification protocols that prevent them — built directly from the sanctions record.