David Angel Sifuentes, III v. Capital One
CA, Tenth Circuit 6 February 2026
- Party
- Pro Se Litigant
- AI Tool
- Implied / unconfirmed
Hallucinated Content
Fabricated
- Case Law
Sifuentes cited a 2008 D.C. case titled "In re Search of a Nextel Cellular Telephone" that does not exist; the court found the authority fabricated and not supportive of his proposition.
False Quotes
- Case Law
Sifuentes attributes language to Sinclair v. Wainwright that the court found nowhere in that opinion; the panel determined the quoted language does not appear in the cited case.
Misrepresented
- Case Law
A reporter citation supplied by Sifuentes retrieves a different case name and does not contain the legal proposition he attributes to it; the court noted the citation did not support his argument.
Outcome
No sanction or outcome recorded.