USA

David Angel Sifuentes, III v. Capital One

CA, Tenth Circuit 6 February 2026
Party
Pro Se Litigant
AI Tool
Implied / unconfirmed

Hallucinated Content

Fabricated

  1. Case Law

    Sifuentes cited a 2008 D.C. case titled "In re Search of a Nextel Cellular Telephone" that does not exist; the court found the authority fabricated and not supportive of his proposition.

False Quotes

  1. Case Law

    Sifuentes attributes language to Sinclair v. Wainwright that the court found nowhere in that opinion; the panel determined the quoted language does not appear in the cited case.

Misrepresented

  1. Case Law

    A reporter citation supplied by Sifuentes retrieves a different case name and does not contain the legal proposition he attributes to it; the court noted the citation did not support his argument.


Outcome

No sanction or outcome recorded.


View source document →