Germany

Cologne District Court, 312 F 130/25

Cologne District Court (Family Court) 2 July 2025
Party
Lawyer
AI Tool
Implied / unconfirmed

Hallucinated Content

Fabricated

  1. Doctrinal Work

    Court found citation to 'Viefhues' in a Munich commentary and marginal nos. (9th ed. 2021, marginal no. 65 ff.) to be incorrect and fictitious; actual commentary and edition details differ.

  2. Doctrinal Work

    Court could not locate the cited book 'Brons, Kindeswohl und Elternverantwortung, 2013, pp. 175 ff.' and determined the reference to be fictitious.

  3. Doctrinal Work

    Reference to 'Völkl, FamRB 2015, p. 74' was found to be incorrect/misleading; the actual FamRB 2015 pages cited contain a different essay (pp. 70-77) and the asserted citation is fictitious.

  4. Doctrinal Work

    Citation 'Meyer-Götz, in: Hauß/Gernhuber, Familienrecht, 6th ed. 2022, § 1671, marginal no. 33' was not found; court concluded the reference does not exist and appears conflated.

  5. Case Law

    Citation to an 'OLG Frankfurt' decision reported at 'FamRZ 2021, p. 70' was incorrect; the court determined the cited decision/reference was fictitious or mislocated.


Outcome

Court admonished the attorney and warned that knowingly disseminating untruths may violate BRAO §43a(3)

View source document →