Alana Kotler v Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation
- Party
- Pro Se Litigant
- AI Tool
- Implied / unconfirmed
Hallucinated Content
Fabricated
- Case Law
Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited.
- Case Law
Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited.
- Case Law
Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited.
- Case Law
Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited.
- Case Law
Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited.
- Case Law
Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited (Latreille appears again in another citation form).
- Case Law
Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited (Hargrave variant cited by applicant not located).
- Case Law
Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited.
- Case Law
Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited (external tribunal decisions cited but not located).
- Case Law
Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited (external tribunal decision cited but not located).
- Case Law
Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited.
- Case Law
Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited (board could not locate the Millen decision as cited).
- Case Law
Unreported decision cited by applicant that the Board could not locate as cited.
- Case Law
Recent external decision cited by applicant that the Board and OSSTF could not locate as cited.
Misrepresented
- Case Law
Applicant relied on Micheal Lind v. International Alliance...; the Board located a decision with the same locator but it is a brief procedural decision that does not support the proposition relied upon by the applicant (misrepresented).
Outcome
Notes
The applicant relied on numerous case citations that the Board and OSSTF could not locate as cited; one located decision did not support the proposition relied upon. Applicant acknowledged possible citation errors and was asked to provide copies but objected. The Board refused to rely on unlocatable authorities and dismissed the application.